- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Flattr
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
A person here in my town asked me the other day what my beliefs are regarding climate change. Note that phrasing. It was a political and ideological question. Isn’t everything these days?
The question was asked sincerely and in good will, and I answered honestly. That means my thoughts won’t fit on a bumper sticker, and, to an activist, probably came across as equivocating, though they’re not. Here’s the deal: Of course I “believe” in climate change. The climate on Earth has changed, sometimes radically, over and over and over again.
My series on the Bozeman Trail War on Frontier Partisans begins with:
Blame it on climate change. In the mid-19th century, the Little Ice Age receded, and the ecology of the Great Plains began to change. The rich, buffalo-supporting grasslands grew dry and the herds, already disrupted by the mass emigration of American wagon trains, migrated out of their usual haunts. The Lakota felt the change in their very bones, and they cast their eyes toward a well-watered, ecologically robust pocket of the high plains east of the Big Horn Mountains in what is now north-central Wyoming and southeastern Montana: the Powder River Country.

A change in climate and in the migration patterns of bison touched off an intense conflict over prime hunting grounds. Art by Charles M. Russell.
The actual question was, “Do you believe in massive state intervention to limit carbon emissions?”
My answer to that is no. Not because I don’t think carbon emissions have an impact — there’s evidence that they do. Anyway, you don’t need to look to your carbon footprint to notice massive, pernicious impact of humankind on the health of the planet — in the extinction of species due to habitat loss; a garbage dump the size of Texas in the Pacific Ocean… Hell, I grew up in Los Angeles, which would not exist in its current form had not the old harlot sucked the life out of the Owens Valley like a vampire. And now, it seems, L.A. has caught up with me in Oregon.
We’re way beyond carrying capacity — at least for the kind of life the likes of me want to live. Like the cowboy singer said:
I loved my fellow man the best
When he was scattered some*
My skepticism toward “climate action” is two-fold:
- I am quite certain the “cure” would be worse than the ill. “Climate Action” is mighty susceptible to becoming religious zealotry. After all, what crusade could be more righteous than saving the world? And, as C.S. Lewis pointed out, “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
- While empowering moral busybodies, up to and including people who want to tell you what you can eat, such intervention simply won’t work. Massive “climate action” risks significant dislocations in the global economy. Even the rosiest prognostications about a “green economy” can’t escape the reality that its benefits will be unevenly distributed and risk impoverishment. Poverty is not the friend of environmentalism. And I never could figure out how telling the developing world that it can’t develop the same way we did jibes with diversity, equity and inclusion.
Look, I’m all for a better mousetrap. You build an electric vehicle that I can afford, I’ll drive it — and enjoy the stealth element. I don’t like plastic and I’m happy to maybe pay a bit more for locally-raised beef, which is better on every level anyway. But I won’t tolerate being harangued by proselytizing vegans or hectored by those who would pretend that alternative energy is a free ride to a green utopia. There are environmental and social costs to any form of energy. And there’s a whole lot of us humans putting demands on the infrastructure. Probably an unsustainable number of humans for whatever infrastructure we can craft.

Rising sea levels, or the rising tide of state intervention? Take your pick.
It may well be that we have shit the bed and a species, and will simply have to pay the price for it. Like the founders of the Dark Mountain Project, I am skeptical on both philosophical and practical levels that further technological innovation can cure the ills that technological innovation has created. And, make no mistake, it was technical innovation that made possible the leviathan state that each day becomes more intrusive upon our lives.
So, what do we do about climate change? We should be thinking in terms of climate resiliency. On a national/international level, we’d best be planning for mass migration and conflict. The Lakota will be moving into the Powder River Country — that action replicated on a scale that the Plains Tribes of the 1850s could scarcely imagine. The things that government is properly tasked to do — protecting its citizens — must be ramped up to a high level of efficiency and effectiveness. Talking about emergency management here — storm, fire, disease.
On an individual, family and community level? Be prepared. Choose who you trust and build your relationships. And be grateful, as the Don Edwards song goes, that you weren’t born no later than you was.
Matthew says
Great to see a new piece here at Running.
I tend to think that the warming climate is part of a natural process. I won’t say man has no impact on climate, but the climate is not so easy controlled. That truth, though, can be more frightening. There may be nothing to do to prevent it. I am not certain what the future holds. Predicting the future is very hard, perhaps impossible to do.
I’m not going live in fear of what comes, though. Be nice if some did come up with a good alternative energy source. There’s nuclear but that has its own issues.
Reese Crawford says
CS Lewis and Don Edwards both today! You manage to tie so many of my influences together. The Old Cow Man holds a special place in my heart, as the Charles Badger Clark Jr poem was read to me as a child.
Words of thought and wisdom as always. I would love to have a leather bound copy of Running Iron Report essays to sit next to my copy of Writings of Thomas Paine.
Well, THAT comment made my day.
Nice to see some level-headedness on this issue. Considering there is evidence that the climate may have been warmer in Roman and medieval times than it is now, I’m not going to worry about it too much. Other than government overreach. Your quote from Lewis is spot-on.
Quixotic Mainer says
Great post! Your sentiments are as usual, pretty closely lined up with my own. A great book I retained from undergrad was William Cronon’s “Changes in the Land”, which covers pretty exhaustively the various moods and piques North America has undertaken just since the European arrival.
When I was lucky enough to dabble in some archaeology, we were hunting artifacts associated with the “Red Paint People”, who lived up here in the northeast prior to the Abanaki. One of their primary foods was locally caught swordfish, which resided within canoeing distance. The water got colder, the fish moved, and the Red Paint tribe moved away with them. But they left a lot of swordfish noses in their middens. Can’t argue that point.
slm says
I tend to think of “Climate Change” as a solution rather than a problem. Getting a little crowded around here don’t you think?