- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
Standing in the pouring rain
All alone in a world that’s changed
Running scared now forced to hide
In a land where he once stood with pride
But he’ll find his way by the morning light…— David Hidalgo / Louis Frausto Perez (Los Lobos)
It is integral to the mission and purpose of The Running Iron Report to be a beacon fire for those who feel that they are “all alone in a world that’s changed.” Those of our tribe don’t have to do more than step out the door to realize that the whole map has become uncharted space where there be dragons.
Last week, my band played a Monday evening gig at a local wine bar. Nice, low-key deal. Having played the traditional folk rave-up Whisky In A Jar, I later introduced our Gaelic Storm pirate anthem Lovers’ Wreck thus:
“We believe in diversity, equity and inclusion, so — we’ve done a song about whisky; now we’re going to do a song about rum.”
After the gig a woman approached me to tell me that “as a person who LIVES diversity, equity and inclusion” my crack had “landed badly” with her and after that she “couldn’t hear my music,” though she was “sure it was beautiful.”
My response was, “Good for you.”
I mean, what do you do with that? Laugh, I suppose, though I’m generally a polite enough soul not to guffaw in a person’s face even when they deserve it.
As a friend pointed out, “that was straight out of Portlandia.”
*
Now, I’m no stranger to this kind of kookiness. My alma mater is UC Santa Cruz, an early-adopter of humorless political correctness and performative outrage. I guess I’m still surprised that it has gone mainstream enough to rear its head in Central Oregon — but the world has changed.
Samuel K. Dolan an author and independent Western historian whom I greatly respect (not least for his well-articulated political independence) recently attended a cultural event at a museum in Missoula, Montana, where he was assailed by the Dragons of Debunkery. Here’s how he describes the experience in a Facebook post:
“It was an ‘open discussion’ format between two panelists, University of Montana professor Debra Magpie Earling and Montana author Russell Rowland. I probably should have left before the discussion began. For the next hour or so Earling and Rowland pretty well trashed the entire Western genre, ‘Rodeo culture,’ Western Art (Frederic Remington was dismissed as a racist and Charley Russell did not get away unscathed), Western literature (Zane Grey written off as a ‘dentist from Ohio’… never mind his books are still in print 80 years after his death) and so on…
“The discussion went into increasingly familiar terrain of ‘toxic masculinity’ and a host of adjacent topics. It was sort of like having your entire life roasted. I wanted to leave, but I was surrounded by a sea of Patagonia vests. It wasn’t that I took exception to the criticism of Western movies (though I do love them, even some of the not so good ones). What I didn’t like was the dismissive attitude by a group of seemingly well-educated folks that don’t appear to leave their bubble much and the frequent departures from the truth. The lack of contextualization was I think dangerous. The whole episode left me feeling very dejected and dismayed.”
Well, it’s dismaying.
It’s especially frustrating for those of us who have made a serious effort to look at history with clear eyes, who appreciate myth-making and the impulse that lies beneath it, but also are unafraid to confront the harsh and often ugly realities of the human endeavor, especially in those borderland zones we call “frontiers.” We’re right there with the effort to expand the scope of both history and myth to include all of those who had a hand in making it.
I have no more patience for triumphalist history than Dolan’s Patagonia-vest-clad outfit does, but that doesn’t mean I’m up for a self-congratulatory orgy of cheap debunkery.
My work has demonstrated a startling level of continuity and persistence of certain patterns of action across hundreds of years and a variety of cultures in many different borderlands environments. Cultures meet, mingle and change each other. Borderlands cultures often become something distinct from their cultures of origin. When there is competition for dominance and access to resources, there often develops a brutal cycle of violence in which it’s impossible to simply cast people as “good guys” or “bad guys.”

Los Tejanos Diablos. Not always “the good guys.’
I’m engaged with work now that draws a through line between the brutal borderland conflict in Texas in c. 1830–1915, the dirty guerrilla war in the Northern Transvaal in 1901 and the covert nastiness of the Global War on Terror in the present day. Honest study in this field challenges any mythic image of the guys in the white hats — but as Dolan notes, it also demands a thorough grounding in context.
As I wrote nearly a decade ago when introducing my Frontier Partisans project:
From North America to Africa, Australia to Central Asia, bold men chased riches in land, furs, minerals, timber — and the pure prestige of planting the flag in a “howling wilderness.” That used to be the stuff of triumphalist history and patriotic legend. Nowadays, we see things differently. Today, we don’t like to think much about the way the world we live in was made, about the graves our homes are built upon. Looking backwards in comfort and security, through a lens of politcally-correct piety, we condemn the men who “stole” the Americas, the lands of Africa, the continent of Australia.
It is right to acknowledge the cost of conquest, both in human terms and in terms of environmental degradation. The cost was high. Whole peoples disappeared, ravaged by war and even more by disease. And these bold men with rifles shot whole species to the brink — and past the brink — of extinction. Yet to regret this world historic burst of exploration and conquest and condemn the men who pushed it forward is the rankest kind of hypocrisy. Might as well condemn the tectonic plates for shifting.
The Long Hunter by David Wright.
It’s true that the “wilderness” wasn’t empty. Native peoples thrived there, with a fierce love for their homeland every bit as potent as the land lust that drove the European interlopers. It’s also true that those native peoples had displaced others.
In the words of the great Texas historian T.R. Fehernbach:
‘The Mexica admitted to Cortés that they had come into the Valley of Mexico without lands, but that they had seized the lands of others with shield and arrow. They understood when Cortés told them that he had come with shield and spear to take their lands and give them to others…
‘Had every American told the Plains Indians what many already knew, that because the white men had come the tribes’ days were numbered, and that as conquerors they demanded the Indians’ lands, the warrior societies could have understood this perfectly. Their tragedy would not have been deeper, nor their sorrow any greater. Amerindians would have fought and died, killing no more and no less…’ (Comanche: The Destruction of a People)
*
It would be naïve at best to underestimate the gravity of what is going on here. We are locked in a culture war. The stakes are real, and they are high. An increasingly militant cadre of the performatively woke will, when they can find the leverage, destroy careers and lives. We must be mindful of our tactics. Overreaction to those who assail our values and our very nature plays into their hands (see “Toxic Masculinity”). I can’t really abide the “other side” in the fight, either. I don’t fit in either “camp” and, anyway, engaging in cultural warfare just leaves me, as Dolan was, “dejected and dismayed.”
Better to fully commit to extolling and living our nature, ignoring the slings and arrows, to actively promote what we value, to be a countervailing voice to the lowing of the herd. We may well not prevail. This weird version of a “civilization” may roll over us as surely as Anglo-American civilization extinguished the free life of tribal peoples across the globe. Some of us will go down like Crazy Horse with a bayonet in our back. I accept that this may be my fate.
Look, I don’t want people like that Portlandia caricature in the wine bar to “hear my music.” It’s not for her kind. I can’t say whether or not it’s “beautiful” but at least it’s got balls, and I’m going to keep playing it my own damn way.
It’s the truth that they all look for
Something they must keep alive
Will the wolf survive?
Will the wolf survive?
*
(I love Los Lobos, but Waylon Jennings is the hub of my musical wheel. So… his version).
*
If you value what you read and hear here at The Running Iron Report, please consider supporting us through the purchase of Running Iron Report merch at the Trading Post (link at top of home page) or by a direct donation through the link provided. Running Iron will soon launch a Patreon page offering premium content for patrons. Your readership and support is greatly appreciated.
*
I know you might think this response was supposed to be on Craig’s last post, but I think it applies here.
BADGERS HOLES FOR EVERYONE.
Yes, because it is astonishingly difficult to have any kind of conversation at all with people unable, unwilling, or unequipped to face their own contradictions in a contemplative way. I feel a Running Iron Badger t‑shirt in the offing.
As the kids say, “INSTA-BUY!”
lane batot says
Gettin’ in on this a bit late, but.…there are already some T‑shirts available regarding Africa’s version of this phenomenon–“Honey Badger Don’t Care!”
Steve Erickson says
I really appreciated this piece. Personally relevant. Thanks
You are most welcome.
Matthew says
The wolf will survive. I’m not sure that the “woke” will. I mean if you are out in dire straights over comments other people make, how the hell are you going to handle real adversity?
I wonder how much of this comes from not having any real problems. Today’s society is so comfortable and prosperous that we can afford to think “micro-aggressions” are a real problem.
About the toxic masculinity debate, I always found myself in the middle of feminists who call all masculinity toxic and MRA’s who call their toxic behavior masculine.
We believe in diversity, equity and inclusion, so — we’ve done a song about whisky; now we’re going to do a song about rum
????
????
…great article
Thanks Rebecca.
Ugly Hombre says
But Wait!! you did not do a song about BEER JHC! what a counter revolutionary backslider you is! lol
Yeah GD it- I am from the past another country and don’t fit in- and I can’t believe how far down the leftist rabbit hole our Republic has slid.
You should have told that ‘lady’ “You look sexy in that dress” it would have started a full scale war!
This PC bovine chit has the potential to cost us our country some day.
Homey don’t play that.
Sorry Dolan got bush wacked by those Bolsheviks- his work is first rate- I sent his book to a master old SAA gunsmith lives on a ranch in Arizona, the Hattori Hanzo of the thumb buster- family from Arizona. He told me that Dolan wrote up things in his book that he had never seen.
J.F. Bell says
This came up in a conversation not too long ago. Incidentally, that exchange pivoted around the production of art as entertainment — how to make it, how to sell it, how to get more people buying whichever product you have to offer.
I’ve spent more time than I care to admit (albeit somewhat less of late) worrying about how a particular piece comes across. Some of the feedback is good. Some isn’t. And in looking into the who was saying what, a pattern emerges. Not real obvious at first, but you can’t miss it on the second pass.
The criticism comes mostly from people who were born and have lived their lives a world apart from mine. They can’t see the poetry in a running horse. They don’t own guns. They don’t eat red meat. Most have probably never lived in a city with a population lower than six figures. A few cannot puzzle out the meaning of the term ‘cattle guard.’
This isn’t to suggest they don’t sometimes have a point. But the truth is, the story I’m trying to tell is a foreign language. Some could probably understand it should they take the time. Most won’t.
Out of a hundred, I might sell to fifteen. Twenty on the high end.
That’s fine. Because I could tear it apart, scrub it, set the whole thing in space and put it back together from a checklist with a dozen sensitivity readers and they STILL wouldn’t buy. Down in the bones, it’s not their kind of story. I can’t twist it enough to make it fit their world — and if I could, it wouldn’t survive in any recognizable form.
Twenty out of a hundred. Maybe.
You could argue that ‘my’ people are the insignificant part of that equation. That’s getting it backwards. My people are the only ones that count. I’ll pitch to them and be happy about it. We can revel in our lack of sophistication — meet at the range and go for barbecue afterwards and discuss in proper oilfield/ranch hand/redneck/vet terms what philistines we are in the eyes of our learned betters. There will be cussing. Probably a lot.
And if we pick up a few outsiders in the meantime… that’s fine, too.
The tribe’s still taking applications.
I truly believe that a purposeful secession from the mainstream is the only course that maintains sanity and dignity. That’s maybe especially true for creatives, although it’s a little counterintuitive. It’s impossible in the current climate to seek a broad audience without pandering to sensibilities and sensitivities that can never be satiated. The feeding frenzies and online lynch mobs dedicated to the personal destruction of authors who transgress — or insufficiently adhere to — the orthodoxy is instructive.
The upside of the fragmentation of the publishing and the music industries is that we can find our niche and work it, although it is WORK. You are absolutely right: Our people are the only ones who count when we’re finding an audience. There’s no point and a terrible sacrifice of personal integrity in chasing an audience that will never want our stories and would just as soon see us muzzled.
Your range/day and barbecue is far more desirable than any soiree the literari could throw anyway.
J.F. Bell says
Thinking more on it, it seems there’s been a changes on another level.
You buy a book. You read it. There are three general outcomes:
- You like it
— You like it, with reservations
— You don’t like it
Somehow, some strange way, we’ve gotten to the point where consumers buy an inanimate work and — if their reaction is other than the first — attempt to negotiate. If this happened differently, if this character was like this, if only…
Probably this a marker for mental instability. The thing in question is fixed. It doesn’t move. It doesn’t change. The light in which you see it may. Often as not I’ve revisited so-so books and movies from my youth and loved them in new light. Likewise the inverse, where you visit the familiar and find your outlook and circumstances changed sufficient that it doesn’t bear up anymore.
But that someone else can dig into your life or work and root out what brings them discomfort is a dangerous thing.
Oh well. Back to the badger hole, I suppose.
Harry Pollard says
I’m afraid I resemble those remarks. Well said, Jim.
Robert Fuller says
Let’s play Lighfoots’ Canadian Railroad Trilogy. That should put some Patagonia vests on the floor. Bob Fuller
tom says
in reference to Samuel k dolans’ book, one of the primary reasons, if not the primary, for late statehood for Arizona was we were still too wild and wooly. this would include apache uprisings and various outlaws. one of my favorite stories, which I believe would make a hell of a good movie is the power family shootout. this was law enforcement coming to arrest some slackers (two brothers on a hardscrabble ranch) who would not report to the military draft in 1918 for world war one. also to add twist to Arizona’s wild and wooly late statehood, some of the lawlessness has a Mormon flavor and what they contributed to the “wooly”! i’m a drafted Vietnam vet and I enjoy the term “slacker” and wonder if bone spurs is fake news and define you as a slacker?
The Power story is a great one.
The documentary Power’s War is worthy.