- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Flattr
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- ManageWP.org
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
“NO BLOOD FOR OIL, man!”
That’s what the guitar player said as we listened to the news on the radio, trundling down the 405 Freeway in a panel truck. It was 1990, the U.S. was fixing to boot Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait and I was serving as a roadie for a 1950s-themed rock-n-roll band heading southbound from Los Angeles for a corporate gig at a posh hotel on the waterfront in San Diego.
The guitar player was dead set against getting into what looked fair to be a full-scale shooting war — for any reason, most especially for the filthy lucre that oil represents.
I was still in my 20s then and hadn’t yet developed the sense to avoid getting into arguments with fools while stuck in the cab of a truck on a three-hour drive on an L.A. Freeway. So I told him that was the stupidest slogan ever committed to bumper-stickers and t‑shirts.
“Might as well say, ‘NO BLOOD FOR FOOD!’ or ‘NO BLOOD FOR WATER!’”
The connection was a bit beyond the guitar player. Not because he was stupid, but because his worldview and sense of identity wouldn’t let him link the resource to the food chain — or his ability to drive for three hours to play “Johnny B. Goode” for a bunch of corporate movers-and-shakers who had flown in from all over the country to get drunk and do the bump-and-grind with their co-workers (or their boss).
Nor could he grasp that nobody WANTED Americans to bleed and die for Kuwaiti oil — but ceding control of the Arabian Gulf and a huge percentage of its oil production to a murderous megalomaniac (yeah, I know, recently OUR murderous megalomaniac) wasn’t an acceptable outcome. Because our economic lifeblood really is our economic lifeblood.
*
I had a dream about that long-ago argument early Monday morning. Because I still feel like I’m in the lists, tilting at the near-impervious shields of people who consider the notion that economic life demands some level of risk and sacrifice a blasphemy against the sanctity of human life. As though life can be decoupled from making a living.
I am at pains to make myself clear here: I take this virus very seriously. I do not want to get it; I dread the very thought of my loved ones getting sick; and I understand the necessity of “flattening the curve” to stave off a collapse of red-zone health care systems. The world is in a terrible fix, with no good or easy options. But we must recognize that the social treatment for this pandemic is toxic — and at some point the cure will be worse than the illness.
For, make no mistake, the economic fallout of this pandemic will blight and shorten lives as surely — though less dramatically — as shredded lungs. And the longer the near-shutdown continues, the deeper and more pervasive the damage will be.
We in the West have lost our understanding of the connection between livelihood and life. We are so incomprehensibly wealthy and have been so secure for so long in our wealth and comfort, that we no longer recognize the wolf when he comes to the door.
The wolf is about to make his presence known.
At some point — and soon — we are going to have to move past this moment’s stasis. And that movement will entail risk and sacrifice. Some will die that others may live.
World Health Organization (WHO) special envoy David Nabarro said last Sunday:
“We think it is going to be a virus that stalks the human race for quite a long time to come until we can all have a vaccine that will protect us and that there will be small outbreaks that will emerge sporadically and they will break through our defenses.”
And what if we can’t develop a vaccine in short order? That’s a real possibility, one that our pill-for-every-ill mindset can scarcely comprehend and instinctively recoils against. Coronaviruses are not easy to vaccinate against.
Indian economist Sanjeev Sabhlok wrote in The Times of India on April 11:
“Australian National University academic Peter Collignon has confirmed to me that: ‘I don’t think we can assume with any certainty we will get a safe and effective vaccine for all. We haven’t for a number of other infections eg. HIV, Hep C, Dengue, RSV despite trying very hard.’
“…Virtually everyone who knows about coronaviruses knows that a vaccine is a moonshot.”
That’s a kick in the nuts to the hope that “this too shall pass.” We’re going to have to learn to live with COVID-19.
*
Living with COVID-19 is probably going to have to look a lot like the so-called Swedish model.
Sabhlok:
“Sweden is blessed to have one of the brightest officials in the world at its helm, Anders Tegnell. He has explained to the people of Sweden that there is no easy answer to this problem. They have understood that they have to take responsibility for themselves and their own families. The elderly have to be protected by each family. There is only so much that any government can do.”
It’s important to recognize that the Swedish model isn’t a fix; it’s not really even a “better way.” A lot of health experts think it’s a dangerous gamble. The Swedes are simply trying to choose a least-bad option that is sustainable. They are gambling by taking this approach from the outset — but all of us have to get to that point some time.
We will not return quickly to pre-COVID normal — not until herd immunity reduces its virulence and we have a testing program that can actually get a handle on how pervasive the illness actually is. We must continue to isolate and protect the vulnerable to the degree possible. We must adapt our way of living and take ongoing personal precautions, including modifying social interaction.
But we must venture forth and live and work again.
*
Western culture has become so imbued with the myth and the lie of zero-defect and absolute safety that it will require a massive cultural shift to accept that we actually must live with risk and danger. The puerile notion that any measure is morally imperative “if it saves just one life” will break down in the face of a brutal reeducation in what is actually feasible in a world of limited resources.
Sabhlok again:
“Most nations are behaving like ostriches with their head buried in sand – with febrile dreams about vaccines and treatments. They want to keep their society in suspended animation while reducing the loss of life from the virus. They are oblivious to the incomprehensible cost their society will pay for indefinite lockdowns. Steve Kates, an economist I admire, has estimated that the cost to society of saving a life in extreme, extended lockdowns could be in the range of $300 million. Good luck to Western nations with that.”
And, of course, Sabhlok recognizes that his own nation can’t even pretend to think that such a commitment is possible. Those who are living closer to the bone than Westerners have lived for generations understand something that we must re-learn. Some things can’t be fixed; the best we can do is mitigate — and learn to live again, as our ancestors did, in the valley of the shadow of death.
A bleak wake-up call for … (looks at calendar because it’s all blurring ..) Tuesday morning.
I think you’re right and a few month pause is needed but we can’t go beyond that. We’re all gonna need to mask up and glove up and wash the hell outta everything for a while, yet.
But I know how kids are (schools,) and adults who act worse than kids. (Friend of mine was accosted at the drugstore the other day by a unmasked guy who called my friend a pussy and a libtard for “believing this shit.”)
I think the worst acceptance of this hardship is that it is a disease. I would have no problem walking through a tiger’s territory. Give me a gun, or a spear. I’ll take my chances.
You can’t shoot or spear a damn virus. There is nothing to fight. I think that makes this a hard-sell on the “life ain’t fair” scale. As you note, we are way too comfortable with our use and take-for-granted attitude on modern medicine. A plague in 2020? Who would have thought? Certainly not most of us.
“Accosted by an unmasked guy.” The world turned upside down.
Agree that not being able to fight is a huge psychological burden. For some of us it is hard to adjust to inaction being the right action.
“Libtard”? What an arseling. An ill-fucked foundling, no doubt. (If you’re going to try to insult people, you really should use Old English. It’s MUCH more potent).
Keep the faith my friend. There’s a phoenix on your sword.
My friend has various stories of subway encounters, road rage, shit neighbors, and all sorts of ill-fucked foundlings. The irony being .. he is a *big* guy. Tall and rather damn muscular. The fact that these people throw shit in his direction and don’t end up in the hospital is a statement to his self-control.
But yeah, “libtard.” More freaking politicizing where we least need it.
I once told a particularly obnoxious ill-fucked foundling that he was counting on several people’s restraint due to their positions of responsibility and that he maybe shouldn’t put too much reliance on that in my case. The manner in which he gawped at me was priceless.
Matthew says
You know if dueling was still legal there probably would be less of those people around. They’d either learn to keep quiet or be killed in a duel. I actually think the first will be common since these people don’t like to put their money were their mouth is. Though some would and may even win the duel, but at least they would be putting money where their mouth was.
As REH said, “Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.”
I’m of course being somewhat humorous here but still…
Reese Crawford says
Just to lighten the mood a bit, The quote from The Lone Ranger popped in to my head,
” There comes a time when a good man must wear a mask”
This is so.
From one of Lincoln’s addresses —
“Abraham Lincoln, in an address to the Wisconsin State Agricultural Society in 1859, said: ‘It is said an Eastern monarch once charged his wise men to invent him a sentence to be ever in view and appropriate in all times and situations. They presented him the words, ‘And this, too, shall pass away.’ How much it expresses! How chastening in the hour of pride! How consoling in the depths of affliction.’ ”
And this abstract from Mother Teresa — http://motherteresa123.blogspot.com/2010/05/my-obstacles-and-risks.html
I’ve gone through many obstacles and risks throughout my life…There are many diseases in India and a lot of the other places we went, so there was a larger chance we would get ill and die before our natural life span was over…It was very stressful, and I got clammy quite often. I got major headaches and cramps. It was especially hard as I got into my old age, but I loved doing all the things I did that I kept pushing on until my death…I was very fearful, I will admit that…I had to pray every time before I had a lesson, for I was so fearful that I would almost refuse to go in and teach…It was my job to do that, and I didn’t let my fears get in my way.”
“Each morning we are born again. What we do today is what matters most.” – Buddha
And my personal favorite as spoken by war fighters and peace warriors throughout history as they face the test of courage on the field of battle wherever that battle may be -
“Fuck it. Let’s do this thing!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__vds6iE8qU
Gary Tewalt says
Well stated and I’ve used that phrase “fuck it let’s do this thing” for forty or more years to get rid of a stressful situation I was about to endure. T
Ugly Hombre says
“You know if dueling was still legal there probably would be less of those people around. They’d either learn to keep quiet or be killed in a duel”
Lol yep, My pard who lives on a ranch in north Arizona is the “Hattori Hanzo” gun smith of the Colt SAA. He was active in the 50’s fast draw craze he knew Eastwood, Rod Redwing, Jock Mahoney, Cooper, Roy Chapman etc counted a lot of cowboy actors as his friends. Old now he is one of those guys who have so much knowledge on a subject that interests you- it hurts your head when you talk to him trying to understand.
Hollywood party- a popular cowboy actor was there bragging about how fast he was blah blah. Audie Murphy was also there.
The actor challenged Murphy to a fast draw contest.
Murphy said sure- “but we use live rounds when and where.”?
Actor said “I was just kiddin” went off to get another drink.
lol
Audie Murphy was something else. He was a pretty good country songwriter, too.
Matthew says
Great story, Hombre.
Ugly Hombre says
Thanks Matt- he knows the good and the bad of the old western movie TV show players, Ben Johnson he says was a prince among men- the real deal westerner from every angle.
He said Sammy Davis Jr. and Jerry Lewis were damn good with a SAA Colt and could have been deadly for real.
A low key kinda reclusive master gun handler and smith- very humble and does not want to be recorded or publicised. Dang shame. When I talk to him I take notes burn up my pencil. lol.
One of the last old breed Cowboys. imo
Ugly Hombre says
Never listened to him will check it out- need to order some of his movies to watch during the great lock down- have to wonder what some of those old timers would think about this pandemic.
Gary Tewalt says
Hell ya Audie Murphy would opt for live ammo, and the actor was wise to opt out. All odds were in Audies favor. One he was a seasoned decorated veteran and I truly believed he may have survived the battles because he just turned sideways and displayed a very small target.
Kinda reminded me of that 7’4” NBA GUY that to save money the owners just faxed him to the next city. T